| Back To Comparative Analysis | ||||||||||||||||||
| HAUGEN SYSTEMS ALTERNATIVE RATIO PORTFOLIO BACKTESTS | ||||||||||||||||||
| In this test we checked on how different two-factor pairings would have done. Just like with the Greenblatt | Backtest Parameters: | |||||||||||||||||
| strategy, the factors were ranked and added together to produce an overall ranking for each stock. | Region | U.S. | ||||||||||||||||
| Then we constructed the portfolios just as in the previous test: the population is the largest 1000 US stocks, | Population | Top 1,000 | ||||||||||||||||
| 50 stocks were held each month, four stocks were rebalanced each month, and 12 monthly portfolios were run | # of stocks | 50 | ||||||||||||||||
| (each starting on a different month) for each pairing. The portfolio returns were linked to produce annual | First Date | 1996 | ||||||||||||||||
| returns, and the 12 different portfolios' annual returns were averaged and presented below. | Last Date | 12/31/05 | ||||||||||||||||
| Since our previous results indicated that sector omissions were unimportant, all sectors were included in these tests. | Sector Constrain | No | ||||||||||||||||
| For comparison purposes, the Haugen Model's average annual returns (from the same portfolio methodology) | Rebalance periodicity | Monthly | ||||||||||||||||
| are presented along with the annual S&P 500 returns. | Number to rebalance | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
| Greenblatt | Earnings | Return on | Return on | Return on | Earning | Earnings | Return on | Greenblatt | Haugen | S&P | ||||||||
| Return on Assets | Yield | Equity | Assets | Assets | Yield | Yield | Assets | Returns | Model | 500 | ||||||||
| & Earnings Yld | plus | plus | plus | plus | plus | plus | plus | (from the | Index | |||||||||
| All | Profit | Book to | Book to | Cash Flow | Sales over | Return on | Sales to | book) | ||||||||||
| Sectors | Margin | Price | Price | Yield | Assets | Equity | Price | |||||||||||
| ---------------------A V E R A G E P O R T F O L I O T O T A L R E T U R N----------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1996 | 30.96% | 35.59% | 32.99% | 31.92% | 31.07% | 36.23% | 31.60% | 37.74% | 37.40% | 48.06% | 22.96% | |||||||
| 1997 | 11.13% | 26.50% | 25.57% | 15.41% | 13.43% | 15.75% | 20.17% | 15.03% | 41.00% | 38.83% | 33.36% | |||||||
| 1998 | 8.91% | 4.38% | 1.46% | 8.67% | 8.60% | -1.11% | 5.32% | 1.71% | 32.60% | 29.61% | 28.58% | |||||||
| 1999 | 12.35% | 12.92% | 6.16% | 8.59% | 12.94% | 2.55% | 4.78% | 2.79% | 14.40% | 42.17% | 21.04% | |||||||
| 2000 | 17.28% | 25.60% | 24.93% | 17.67% | 19.06% | 24.26% | 21.69% | 20.85% | 12.80% | -3.53% | -9.11% | |||||||
| 2001 | 7.61% | 6.81% | 9.34% | 8.10% | 8.86% | 13.71% | 5.25% | 14.99% | 38.20% | 1.06% | -11.89% | |||||||
| 2002 | 6.50% | 10.42% | 9.66% | 11.36% | 7.15% | 4.51% | 3.67% | 3.97% | -25.30% | 3.78% | -22.10% | |||||||
| 2003 | 31.13% | 31.76% | 38.11% | 38.92% | 33.21% | 35.03% | 32.77% | 30.36% | 50.50% | 33.92% | 28.68% | |||||||
| 2004 | 23.29% | 16.83% | 22.26% | 24.22% | 24.70% | 26.01% | 21.62% | 21.41% | 27.60% | 26.69% | 10.88% | |||||||
| 2005* | 20.43% | 20.54% | 21.53% | 18.27% | 22.00% | 18.39% | 24.18% | 18.14% | N/A | 32.70% | 4.91% | |||||||
| Averge Linked Annual Ret. | 16.64% | 18.71% | 18.65% | 17.91% | 17.77% | 16.88% | 16.60% | 16.17% | 23.27% | 24.05% | 9.07% | |||||||
| Average Annual Return | 16.96% | 19.14% | 19.20% | 18.31% | 18.10% | 17.53% | 17.11% | 16.70% | 25.47% | 25.33% | 10.73% | |||||||
| Longitudinal Std.Dev. | 9.22% | 10.63% | 12.06% | 10.51% | 9.43% | 13.05% | 11.39% | 11.82% | 22.61% | 18.31% | 19.51% | |||||||
| T-Stat | 5.52 | 5.40 | 4.78 | 5.23 | 5.76 | 4.03 | 4.50 | 4.24 | 3.19 | 4.15 | 1.65 | |||||||
| Probability Total Ret < 0 | 2.10% | 2.63% | 5.68% | 3.43% | 1.03% | 9.82% | 7.12% | 8.60% | 13.97% | 9.11% | 28.43% | |||||||
| ---------------------A V E R A G E P O R T F O L I O E X C E S S R E T U R N----------------------- | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1996 | 8.00% | 12.63% | 10.03% | 8.96% | 8.11% | 13.27% | 8.64% | 14.78% | 14.44% | 25.10% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 1997 | -22.24% | -6.86% | -7.79% | -17.95% | -19.94% | -17.61% | -13.20% | -18.33% | 7.64% | 5.46% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 1998 | -19.67% | -24.20% | -27.12% | -19.91% | -19.98% | -29.69% | -23.26% | -26.87% | 4.02% | 1.03% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 1999 | -8.69% | -8.13% | -14.88% | -12.45% | -8.10% | -18.49% | -16.27% | -18.25% | -6.64% | 21.13% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2000 | 26.39% | 34.70% | 34.03% | 26.77% | 28.17% | 33.36% | 30.80% | 29.96% | 21.91% | 5.58% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2001 | 19.50% | 18.70% | 21.22% | 19.99% | 20.75% | 25.59% | 17.13% | 26.88% | 50.09% | 12.94% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2002 | 28.60% | 32.53% | 31.76% | 33.46% | 29.25% | 26.61% | 25.77% | 26.07% | -3.20% | 25.88% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2003 | 2.44% | 3.07% | 9.42% | 10.23% | 4.53% | 6.35% | 4.09% | 1.68% | 21.82% | 5.24% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2004 | 12.42% | 5.95% | 11.38% | 13.34% | 13.83% | 15.13% | 10.74% | 10.54% | 16.72% | 15.82% | 0.00% | |||||||
| 2005* | 15.52% | 15.64% | 16.62% | 13.37% | 17.09% | 13.48% | 19.27% | 13.23% | N/A | 27.79% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Average Annual Return | 6.23% | 8.40% | 8.47% | 7.58% | 7.37% | 6.80% | 6.37% | 5.97% | 14.73% | 14.60% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Longitudinal Std.Dev. | 18.04% | 18.42% | 19.76% | 18.49% | 18.16% | 21.54% | 18.43% | 20.66% | 16.94% | 9.97% | ||||||||
| Information Ratio | 0.35 | 0.46 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.41 | 0.32 | 0.35 | 0.29 | 0.87 | 1.46 | ||||||||
| T-Stat | 1.04 | 1.37 | 1.29 | 1.23 | 1.22 | 0.95 | 1.04 | 0.87 | 2.46 | 4.39 | ||||||||
| Probability Excess Ret < 0 | 35.28% | 31.42% | 32.35% | 32.99% | 33.13% | 36.37% | 35.26% | 37.38% | 19.69% | 7.74% | ||||||||
| Each test's results were computed as follows: | ||||||||||||||||||
| 1. First the test that began in January had the monthly returns linked together to get an annual total return for 1997. Linking is the | ||||||||||||||||||
| geometric average calculated by adding 1 to each monthly return, multiplying the numbers together, and subracting 1. | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2. Then 1998 thru 2002 had the total returns calculated in a similar way. | ||||||||||||||||||
| 3. Then the February portfolio's annual returns were calculated the same way, then March, and so on resulting in a table | ||||||||||||||||||
| with 6 by 12 annual returns | ||||||||||||||||||
| 4. Then 1997's average annual return was calculated by taking the arithmetic average of all 12 portfolio's 1997 results | ||||||||||||||||||
| 5. The rest of the year's average annual returns were then calculated. | ||||||||||||||||||
| The Average Linked Annual Return was then computed by linking these average annual returns together. Like with the monthly | ||||||||||||||||||
| returns, above, we added 1 to each annual return, and multiplied the numbers together. Then, that product was taken to the | ||||||||||||||||||
| 12 / 72nd power before subtracting by one. The numbers from Greenblatt's books were already geometric averages, so the | ||||||||||||||||||
| average linked annual return could be calculated the same way as in the rest of the columns. | ||||||||||||||||||
| The Average Annual Return is the arithmetic average of each test's (eg Jan96, Jan97, Feb96, etc) montly total return. | ||||||||||||||||||
| The longitudinal standard deviation is calculated by taking a standard, non-biased standard deviation of the average annual returns | ||||||||||||||||||
| The information ratio is the average excess return divided by the standard deviation of the excess returns | ||||||||||||||||||
| The t-stat is the average annual return divided by the standard deviation divided by the square root of the number of years in the study. | ||||||||||||||||||
| The probability is calculated by first finding the range of returns in the bell curve (eg, 95% of the returns will be within 2 standard | ||||||||||||||||||
| deviations) and then calculating the ratio of this range and dividing by 2. | ||||||||||||||||||
| Total Return left 95% | -1.49% | -2.13% | -4.92% | -2.70% | -0.76% | -8.57% | -5.68% | -6.94% | -19.74% | -11.29% | -28.29% | |||||||
| right 95% | 35.41% | 40.40% | 43.32% | 39.32% | 36.96% | 43.63% | 39.89% | 40.34% | 70.68% | 61.95% | 49.75% | |||||||
| Excess Return left 95% | -29.85% | -28.43% | -31.05% | -29.40% | -28.95% | -36.27% | -30.49% | -35.35% | -19.14% | -5.35% | 0.00% | |||||||
| right 95% | 42.31% | 45.24% | 47.98% | 44.56% | 43.69% | 49.87% | 43.24% | 47.29% | 48.61% | 34.54% | 0.00% | |||||||
| Notes: | tstat(row) = ave(row) / (std(row) / ((n - 1) ^ 0.5)) | |||||||||||||||||
| 68-95-97 | ||||||||||||||||||